AUTIXON ENGINEERING TOOLS / ENERGY
Turn bills, operating data and equipment information into an auditable energy baseline and prioritized improvement plan.
Use one or several bills. Annual figures are only annualized when fewer than 12 valid months are supplied.
| Month | Energy (kWh) | Total bill (MAD) | Peak (kW) | Production |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | ||||
| Feb | ||||
| Mar | ||||
| Apr | ||||
| May | ||||
| Jun | ||||
| Jul | ||||
| Aug | ||||
| Sep | ||||
| Oct | ||||
| Nov | ||||
| Dec |
Start with utility bills, then deepen the audit with demand, production, schedules and loads. Missing evidence is never replaced with fabricated results.
Turn bills, production, demand, operating schedules and load inventory into auditable KPIs and evidence-based energy-saving actions.
The audit adapts to data maturity. Valid billing periods are aggregated or explicitly annualized; operating and load data deepen base-load, demand, power-factor and end-use analysis. Opportunities are created only when supporting evidence is available, with assumptions and confidence shown.
Annualized energy = valid-period energy × 12 / valid monthsSpecific energy consumption = energy / production quantitySimple payback = investment / annual monetary savingIf nine valid bills total 900 MWh, the explicit preliminary annualization is 1,200 MWh/year; it remains an estimate until twelve representative months are supplied.
Start with data quality and the largest supported consumers. Compare current and optimized scenarios conservatively because opportunities may overlap and savings are not automatically additive.
Yes, for a preliminary baseline and bill-pattern review; unsupported equipment savings are not invented.
It is energy divided by a stated production unit and period, useful only with consistent boundaries.
No. The tool flags overlap and uses a conservative combined scenario where actions affect the same energy.
Twelve representative bills, interval demand, production normalization, operating schedules and measured load data.